<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>idhana.com &#187; Frameworks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idhana.com/tag/frameworks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idhana.com</link>
	<description>Making happy users!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 06:58:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The curious case of link based default buttons</title>
		<link>http://idhana.com/2009/01/23/the-curious-case-of-link-based-default-buttons/</link>
		<comments>http://idhana.com/2009/01/23/the-curious-case-of-link-based-default-buttons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 03:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dhana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frameworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jQuery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive enhancements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idhana.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="imgleft" src="http://idhana.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/enter.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="116" />While working on a site today that was built to support multiple languages, I ran into a small issue.  Since the site's buttons were all actually text links (hrefs) made to look like good ol' regular buttons (easier to do this rather than creating multiple button sets for each language), the default button action code I had working for other sites didn't work for this particular site.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idhana.com/2009/01/23/the-curious-case-of-link-based-default-buttons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Say You About CSS Frameworks?</title>
		<link>http://idhana.com/2007/12/12/what-say-you-about-css-frameworks/</link>
		<comments>http://idhana.com/2007/12/12/what-say-you-about-css-frameworks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dhana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frameworks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idhana.com/2007/12/12/what-say-you-about-css-frameworks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://idhana.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/framework.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Framework" class="imgleft" />There has been some talk recently about frameworks.  <a href="http://www2.jeffcroft.com/blog/2007/nov/17/whats-not-love-about-css-frameworks/" title="Jeff Croft for frameworks">Some for</a>, <a href="http://mondaybynoon.com/2007/08/27/please-do-not-use-css-frameworks/" title="Jonathan Christopher against frameworks">some against</a> and some on the fence.  As someone who has not tried her hand at a single established framework, I have to say I am rather ambivalent about them. When I first read about the first CSS framework, my initial thoughts bordered on the negative. I was constantly arguing in my mind about the extra bloated code. Then my mind raced to the unsemantic code. And it went on and on …]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idhana.com/2007/12/12/what-say-you-about-css-frameworks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

