<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>idhana.com &#187; Efficiency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idhana.com/tag/efficiency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idhana.com</link>
	<description>Making happy users!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 06:58:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Making happy users</title>
		<link>http://idhana.com/2009/08/05/making-happy-users/</link>
		<comments>http://idhana.com/2009/08/05/making-happy-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 05:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dhana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Excise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idhana.com/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://idhana.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/happy.gif" alt="" class="imgleft" />I was 17 when I announced to my orthodontist I wanted to be an industrial engineer.  I was so sure about this.  The weeks before, I had spent time scouring Encyclopaedia Britannica (yes, those were the days before Wikipedia) finding out what industrial engineers do and was hooked.  

So, today, when I came across <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/banking-budgeting/article/107468/latest-starbucks-buzzword-lean-japanese-techniques.html?mod=bb-budgeting">this article in the Wall Street Journal</a> about Starbucks's 'Lean' Japanese Techniques, my long forgotten dream bubbled back up to consciousness.  I traded the assembly line for computer applications, but the passion remained, albeit, driven by another media.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idhana.com/2009/08/05/making-happy-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constructor vs. class methods in Javascript</title>
		<link>http://idhana.com/2009/07/13/constructor-vs-class-methods-in-javascript/</link>
		<comments>http://idhana.com/2009/07/13/constructor-vs-class-methods-in-javascript/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dhana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efficiency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idhana.com/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://idhana.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/lightbulb.jpg" class="imgleft" alt="" title="Light by David G. Romero" />There are many ways to declare functions in Javascript.  Sometimes, the way we choose to declare them might just be a matter of preference, but it's good nevertheless to know some of the hidden costs that can occur when using certain constructs.

Here, we're going to take a look at two different methods and compare their efficiencies.  Before we jump into these different methods, here's a quick refresher for those of you who aren't too sure of the difference between <strong>classes</strong> and <strong>instances</strong>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idhana.com/2009/07/13/constructor-vs-class-methods-in-javascript/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the eye doesn&#8217;t catch it&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://idhana.com/2009/01/29/when-the-eye-doesnt-catch-it/</link>
		<comments>http://idhana.com/2009/01/29/when-the-eye-doesnt-catch-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dhana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idhana.com/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://idhana.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/hotspot.gif" alt="" width="100" height="100" class="imgleft" />I noticed I was being charged twice for my hosting account.  The first time I noticed the charge, I logged into my account and there it was, 2 hosting accounts under my name.  I clicked the checkbox next to the New Account and hit "Cancel". ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idhana.com/2009/01/29/when-the-eye-doesnt-catch-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Say You About CSS Frameworks?</title>
		<link>http://idhana.com/2007/12/12/what-say-you-about-css-frameworks/</link>
		<comments>http://idhana.com/2007/12/12/what-say-you-about-css-frameworks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 05:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dhana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frameworks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idhana.com/2007/12/12/what-say-you-about-css-frameworks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://idhana.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/framework.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Framework" class="imgleft" />There has been some talk recently about frameworks.  <a href="http://www2.jeffcroft.com/blog/2007/nov/17/whats-not-love-about-css-frameworks/" title="Jeff Croft for frameworks">Some for</a>, <a href="http://mondaybynoon.com/2007/08/27/please-do-not-use-css-frameworks/" title="Jonathan Christopher against frameworks">some against</a> and some on the fence.  As someone who has not tried her hand at a single established framework, I have to say I am rather ambivalent about them. When I first read about the first CSS framework, my initial thoughts bordered on the negative. I was constantly arguing in my mind about the extra bloated code. Then my mind raced to the unsemantic code. And it went on and on …]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://idhana.com/2007/12/12/what-say-you-about-css-frameworks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

